At 2001-09-23 00:45, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty wrote: >No, unfortunately not. Consider, for example, that storage >qualifiers would have to be generated correctly and there is >no way to determine form a Haskell type whether a `const' >modifier needs to be added. I would assume that Ptr types would always be mapped to non-const pointers. Do you have an example of a Haskell type for a foreign import function, for which the corresponding C function type would be ambiguous? -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
- RE: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Simon Marlow
- RE: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Ashley Yakeley
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Ashley Yakeley
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Ashley Yakeley
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Ashley Yakeley
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Ashley Yakeley
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Ashley Yakeley
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Ashley Yakeley
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Ashley Yakeley
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Ashley Yakeley
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Ashley Yakeley
- Re: Ptr and ForeignPtr Questions Manuel M. T. Chakravarty