"Simon Peyton-Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > | What about my idea? Can't there be a module, say called > | *interpreter* which > | you can add and remove definitions from on-the-fly? > | Something that would put you tighter in the loop. Without > | having to go back > | to the editor edit stuff, reload from interpreter, choke on > | error, see what > | went wrong, etc. Just scratch some code on the CLI, see what > | you've defined > | so far, edit the current module, and evaluate what you want > | to. > > So the CLI would have to have a way to show you what the > current "interpreter" module was, and let you edit it. How > does that differ from an editor? This smells like a tarpit to > me: once you provide a basic editor, everyone will want more > features. Better, surely, to use an existing editor?
Definitely. An environment like this is pretty trivial todo in Emacs. In fact, the Emacs Haskell mode does most of that already anyway. Manuel _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
