Er, i found the relevant discussion thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03115.html.
Also i perceive that i should be able to use the rewrite rules to achieve
what i want. Thanks.
-Amit.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Amit Garg | Office: ACES 6SEo4E
Graduate Student | Phone : (512) 232-7875
Computer Sciences | Res : 2000 Pearl St. #207
University of Texas at Austin | Phone : (512) 560-6970
Homepage: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~amitji
-------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Amit Garg wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is list-like monad comprehension not supported? Is there a simple &
> elegant way of expressing ghc-extended pattern matching using `do'
> notation instead of list comprehension? (I dont want to end up using the
> case statement).
>
> I still dont understand monads too well so i apologize if this is a silly
> question.
>
> Thanks,
> -Amit.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Amit Garg | Office: ACES 6SEo4E
> Graduate Student | Phone : (512) 232-7875
> Computer Sciences | Res : 2000 Pearl St. #207
> University of Texas at Austin | Phone : (512) 560-6970
> Homepage: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~amitji
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
