No, I don't think you missed anything, it's a wrinkle
in the OPTIONS impl that probably ought to be
straightened out.
--sigbjorn
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean Herington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sigbjorn Finne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 17:43
Subject: Re: OPTIONS in a literate source file
> Thanks, that did it.
>
> Did I miss this subtlety in the documentation, or should it be added
> there?
>
> Dean
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
>
> > Try
> >
> > >{-# OPTIONS -fglasgow-exts #-}
> >
> > i.e., no space between '>' and '{'.
> >
> > --sigbjorn
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dean Herington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 17:26
> > Subject: OPTIONS in a literate source file
> >
> >
> > > I can't figure out how to get GHC to recognize my OPTIONS pragmas in a
> > > literate source file. Neither
> > >
> > > > {-# OPTIONS -fglasgow-exts #-}
> > >
> > > nor
> > >
> > > {-# OPTIONS -fglasgow-exts #-}
> > >
> > > works as the first line in the file. Can anybody tell me what I'm
doing
> > > wrong?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
