tis 2002-01-22 klockan 15.48 skrev Simon Marlow:
> > I just noted that 5.02.2 is binary incompatible with 5.02.1 which is a
> > minor nuisance, since I must then recompile all my .o-files.
> >
> > This was not mentioned in the release notes, perhaps it was
> > unintentional?
>
> Yes, this is the case for *all* releases of GHC, even minor ones(*). It would be
>nice to improve this situation, but unfortunately retaining binary compatibility is
>not straightforward due to the high level of coupling between compiled modules - the
>price you pay for aggressive inter-module optimistaion.
Ok, then I would like to make a request that this fact is caught before
linking, since the linker error is a bit non-informative.
There is a version string in the .hi-file, but it only says 502, which
is the same in both releases, so it doesn't help.
Perhaps ghc should put 5022 there?
Regards,
Martin
--
[ http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~d95mback/ ] [ PGP: 0x453504F1 ] [ UIN:
4439498 ]
Opinions expressed above are mine, and not those of my future
employees.
SIGBORE: Signature boring error, core dumped
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
