> I'd say that's because in the second case you also got to apply the (,),
> besides the (+)/(-) constructor during the transversing...
> Am I right?

opss... I meant to write: the (,) constructor besides the (+)/(-)...
J.A.
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to