"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> data STuple = STuple !Int Foo >> >> is slightly less efficient than using a normal tuple >> >> (Int,Foo)
> Just checking... with -funbox-strict-fields, right? Yep. > It's possible that the boxed Int is being reconstructed for some > reason. You'll be able to see the difference more accurately using > heap profiling. Yeah, I guess I'll have to try to find an RPM where profiling works properly. (Time to upgrade to 5.02.2 anyway, isn't it.) I guess I'll try to rewrite the whole thing using monadic arrays that update in place. But my nice algorithm is getting more and more cluttered ... sigh. -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
