G'day all. > > Why is it GHC "5.02.2", "5.03" etc.? Wouldn't it be easier > > with "5.2.2", "5.3"?
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > I don't know, probably historical reasons: as far as I can remember, > GHC's version numbers always had two digits after the decimal point. At least until you get into two-digit major version numbers, this way of doing things makes the filenames appear in version order when you type 'ls'. Cheers, Andrew Bromage _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
