Is there any particular reason FiniteMap (and hence Set) aren't instances of Ord? I realize it's "weird" to define a map to be ordered, but even if the Ord definition were in some sense "nonsensical", being able to have, for instance, Sets of Sets of things would be really nice.
-- Hal Daume III "Computer science is no more about computers | [EMAIL PROTECTED] than astronomy is about telescopes." -Dijkstra | www.isi.edu/~hdaume _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users