Is there any particular reason FiniteMap (and hence Set) aren't instances
of Ord?  I realize it's "weird" to define a map to be ordered, but even if
the Ord definition were in some sense "nonsensical", being able to have,
for instance, Sets of Sets of things would be really nice.

--
Hal Daume III

 "Computer science is no more about computers    | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  than astronomy is about telescopes." -Dijkstra | www.isi.edu/~hdaume

_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to