Hal Daume III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > clearly IOMutArray is the best, even outperforming the > UnboxedArray. Unfortunately, writing code in the IOMutArray format is > much uglier than writing it in the UnboxedArray or NormalArray formats, > even though I know that I'm never going to refer to an old version of the > array, so inplace updates are a-okay. > > So my question is: how can I get better performance without wrapping > everything in the IO (or some other) monad?
<Shameless Plug> This question is the motivation for our work on optimising array codes: <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/papers/CK01.html> Unfortunately, I can't point you to a web site where you can download everything ready to run, but the plan is to have some library code for more general consumption ready in the next couple of weeks. </Shameless Plug> Cheers, Manuel _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
