>> I'd have expected -odir/-hidir to put files in directories relative >> to the source directories. Is that an unreasonable expectation? >in fact I've made that change in CVS. However the changes are >too large to backport to 5.04.2, I'm afraid.
Great! What is the release schedule for 5.06?-) >> 2) with static options not accepted in source file pragmas, I >> often end up compiling everything with the superset of options. >> Shouldn't it be possible to fork a new copy of ghc with new >> static options for parts of a ghc --make run? > >Which static options in particular do you need to change? Just the usual suspects: -package mostly for me, the occasional -O for sources from folks who have figured out which of their many files really need/profit from optimisation. Was interesting to look at the list again, though - in my memory, the list of static flags was longer than it actually turns out to be. -package seems to be the only one left that really hurts.. Well, and the lower level equivalents, of course: -i, -l, -L (these would be especially useful in combination with ghci: just have everything in one file, pass it to ghci and get going..). Thanks, Claus _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
