On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:09:01AM -0000, Simon Marlow wrote: > It is nice, but it introduces too many problems. What happens to any > I/O errors encountered by the lazy I/O? They have to be discarded, > which means you can't effectively use lazy I/O for robust applications > anyway.
*mumble*Exceptions*mumble*, but that of course opens another can of worms... Maybe something similar to exceptions, but better suited to laziness... somehow... hmm... Cheers, Michael p.s.: [x] Lazy I/O must die, just for the record. :) _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
