"Simon Peyton-Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > There's support for more fine-grained distinctions now. We hav > -fffi > -fglasgow-exts > -farrows > -fparr (Manuel's parallel array stuff) > > We could add > -fth > > (or -fTH?) if that seemed better
I think, -fth would be a good idea. (I'd go for lower case, for consistency with -fffi.) Manuel > | -----Original Message----- > | From: Ralf Hinze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Sent: 24 June 2003 13:42 > | To: Ketil Z. Malde; Simon Peyton-Jones > | Cc: John Meacham; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Subject: Re: @-bindings broken in 6.0? > | > | > I think lumping all these extensions under one switch is the > | > problem. > | > | Yep, I agree. Would it be hard to split `-fglasgow-exts' > | up? I'd greatly appreciate a more fine-grained control > | here. > | > | Cheers, Ralf > | > > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
