G'day all. Quoting Hal Daume III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In general, I think the name "array" for these data structures is a bit > misleading, since nearly everyone expects an array to have constant time > read and update, while these only have constant time read. It's no worse than "record" in this respect. Wouldn't everyone expect a field update to be constant time, not linear in the number of fields? Cheers, Andrew Bromage _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
