On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 15:45, scott west wrote: > I'd settle for unregisterised... it seems every time I run through the > whole port process I see to do some new wrong thing each time, hehe. I'm > really just in search of a working ghc implementation for my amd64, > registered or not (the main difference is the use of architecture > specific registers and thus performance right?).
Some ghc nomenclature: unregistered means "half as fast as you'd like it to be". If you're after performance (rather than simply working), you'll need to wait for a registered build, or if you've got the assembler hacking skills you can help out. Duncan _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users