John Meacham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Although perhaps not the simplest way to go about your task, haskell > support for SWIG would be great! it would immediatly give us access to A > LOT of C/C++ libraries which already have swig bindings.
I also thinks so. Playing in the past with Ruby+SWIG looked very easy, but in the meantime I decided to try switch to Haskell :-) > targeting hsc would probably be best, as the portable hsc files could be > distributed for those that don't have haskell-swig nativly installed. If > anyone is looking for a random project, I recommend it. I'd be happy if I could help more with the project, but at the moment just investigating if it would be feasible sicne I cannot estimate the level of difficulty in implemennting it. Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User | #278493 GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
