On 11 August 2004 18:24, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
> "Jon Fairbairn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>> [1] What's the "Do" doing there anyway? You end up writing
>> withSocketsDo$do, and we could do without the Do$do.
>>
>
> Yes, that just doesn't fly, does it? withSocketsDo in user
> code became superfluous a couple of releases back.
Interesting. Why is it superfluous? Should it be made a no-op?
Shouldn't we at least document that it isn't required any more?
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
