I answer to 3 different mails here, so don' get confused: Simon M. wrote: >Like the '.' command in /bin/sh? Yes, we ought to have something like >that. I'll get around to it at some point, unless anyone gets there >first.
I don't know about the '.' command in /bin/sh and I don't have a *nix machine at hand to find out. It's a pity. Tomasz Z. wrote: >Dirty hack - you can put such bindings in ~/.ghci :) I tried that before posting the mail, but it does not work because the .ghci is read before going to the submitted file which contains the functions I need. (And ghci discards the bindings.) (I can read the contents of a file. Even print it, manipulate it (but only with what is supplied with package base). Quit good already!) Later Tomasz Z. > How about this: > > :def . readFile > :. C.hs > > I guess I got there first ;) That works great! And you can even put the ":def . readFile" in the .ghci File! So now I start ghci with "ghci MyFile" wait until it's finished and do ":. all_the_stuff_I_need_in_a_file" and every thing is fine! Thaks a lot, Andreas _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
