On 30 September 2004 10:08, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 28 September 2004 16:06, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
>
>> On the theme of improving Haddock, do you think it could be fixed to
>> generate valid HTML? Here are some examples of the errors I get when
>> running Haddock output through "validate" (the Web Design Group's
>> HTML and XML validator).
>
> Oops! I did check the output with a validator at one point, but it
> looks like I've broken it since. Thanks for pointing it out.
>
It appears that the current CVS Haddock sources generate valid HTML,
according to the W3C validator.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
