Kenny Chamber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How long after posting should it take for a message to appear on the > list?
It should be pretty fast, but some lists moderate posts by non-subscribers. Could this be your problem? For timing, we could look at your headers: Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:33:39 +0300 From: Kenny Chamber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You sent it today, at 07:33:39 +0300 (4:33 UTC). Early bird, huh? Received: from [195.190.104.65] (spb-195-190-104-65.sovintel.ru [195.190.104.65] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail2.hqhost.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBG4Xgt8098072 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:44 GMT 5 seconds later, it is at mail2.hqhost.net, presumably your outgoing mail server. Received: from mail2.hqhost.net (mail2.hqhost.net [64.237.37.220]) by www.haskell.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD51368816 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:21:54 -0500 (EST) www.haskell.org gets it the day before, but is on the American east coast. I make it 4:21 UTC, though, so one of you isn't running NTP like he or she should. Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:33:52 +0100 I don't know who adds this. Received: from haskell.cs.yale.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www.haskell.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D48368835; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:21:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from bugs.haskell.org ([128.36.229.215]:53008 helo=www.haskell.org) (So - what's *really* the name of this computer?) by eik.ii.uib.no with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CenKp-0002qk-8z for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:33:51 +0100 Ends up in my inbox at 05:33:51, subtract one hour if you want UTC. The full trip done in twelwe seconds. If we trust the timestamps to have that good resolution. -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users