Dear GHC developers,
Why do you introduce the runghc command for Cabal, while everyting
is done by the `ghc' driver ?
We have ghc -c
ghc --make
...
Cabal is a part of GHC. So, it is natural to continue:
ghc -configure
ghc -build
ghc -install
And the user would not need to deal with a new notion of `runghc'.
With kind regards,
-----------------
Serge Mechveliani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
