Jim Apple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > robert dockins wrote:
>>> Why remove a feature from a product? Why not, instead, just choose >>> to not use it? >> Because the feature complicates the product, increases maintainance >> costs, and keeps the maintainers from working on other things people >> care more about? > That's fair. I just hope the implicit parameter implementation is > orthogonal enough that it's worth keeping around. Since there were also some hints about starting to use darcs, perhaps it would be possible to maintain a separate branch with the more experimental features? Or will they be too intrusive (and keeping the "experimental" branch in sync with developments from the "trunk" will cause too many conflicts)? -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
