On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 12:39 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > I hope you're not going to conclude *anything* based on the performance > of ackermann and tak! :-)
Well .. whatever a 'registered' build is it does this,
the test is ackermann(3,n), the number in [] is the number
of data points, and (min, average, max) is shown.
xlator ghc-6.2.2
n 10 -[ 14]-> ( 0.68, 0.69, 0.72)
n 11 -[ 18]-> ( 2.81, 2.90, 3.01)
n 12 -[ 13]-> ( 11.72, 12.76, 16.95)
xlator ghc-6.4.1
n 10 -[ 4]-> ( 0.20, 0.20, 0.20)
n 11 -[ 6]-> ( 0.84, 0.84, 0.84)
n 12 -[ 1]-> ( 3.53, 3.53, 3.53)
Of course I won't conclude anything .. :))
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sourceforge dot net>
Download Felix: http://felix.sf.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
