| > You mean, if the data type being defined doesn't actually use the | > generality of GADTs, allow GADT syntax, and deriving() too? | | Yes, that would be very nice for the HaskellDemo and new users. | I'd definitely switch all of my non-GADT datatypes to use that.
I finally got around to doing this; turned out to be trivial. Record syntax aside, you can now declare any Haskell-98 data type using the GADT-style where-clause syntax, including 'deriving'. Simon _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
