Christian Maeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think, you should
> import qualified Data.Set as Set > only and use "Set.map" rather than the deprecated "mapSet" > (most other names from Data.Set make more sense with the "Set." prefix) I can do this of course, but I think it would be nice to be able to use it unqualified in modules that only uses Sets (and doesn't use e.g. Maps or List.(null|map)). If I always have to qualify it, what is the advantage of Set.map instead of mapSet? (Oh, right, I can "import qualified List as Set" -- but then I still have to change "member" to "elem" etc etc.) -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
