On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 12:46:31PM -0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > On 17 November 2005 12:45, Ross Paterson wrote: > | I think the H98 rule is arbitrarily restrictive. But what about > | going further and considering the occurrences of type constructors > | in instance declarations, type signature declarations and expression > | type signatures? > > one could. but GHC doesn't. feels low prio to me...
It would probably not make many more practical programs legal, but it would be less arbitrary and easier to explain. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
