Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:

The trick lies in coming up with a
suitable typed intermediate representation for the program -- System F
isn't enough.

Is that because GHC's TIL is not exactly System F?

As ever, we tend to work harder on things that folk appear to want;

Unrelated question: will "boxy" types allow forall-quantified types in instance declarations?

> so
anyone who is keen on associated types, do sing out and describe your
application a bit.

If yes, I'll clean-up and send out some code showing what I think would be a good use.

Jim

_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to