On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 11:10:47AM -0000, Simon Marlow wrote: > As you probably know, there is a mirror of the GHC source tree in a > darcs repository. (information about accessing the darcs repository is > here: http://cvs.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/GhcDarcs). > > The aim is to eventually switch over to using darcs for our revision > control. The point of this message is to find out what constraints > people have that will affect when we can throw the switch. > > It doesn't look like we'll be able to keep a CVS mirror going once we > switch to darcs, so darcs will be the only way to get an up-to-date GHC > source tree. > > [...] > > Malcolm, Ross - since you both also use the CVS libraries tree, is it > going to be possible for you to switch to using darcs to get the > libraries? Any idea how long you'll need?
No problem for me if you switch over at any time. But how about having a separate repository for each library package? _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
