On 2006-01-17, Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Meanwhile, I noted that the HaXml repo on darcs.haskell.org seems > to be a verbatim copy of the darcs repo at York. This this right? > I was slightly disappointed, since I think I made a bit of a mess of > the CVS -> darcs conversion of HaXml, and was secretly hoping that when > the fptools conversion happened, it would make a cleaner job of it, > based on the full CVS history... Just wondering?
Ahh. You are correct. I noticed that you had a HaXml repository, and believed that the copy in fptools was actually a converted-to-CVS version of that. In any case, I thought it would be unwise to have a darcs repo without common history with the upstream darcs repo, so indeed HaXml is just the fruit of "darcs get" from yours. Re-converting now, since you've presumably committed patches to the darcs side, is probably not going to be practical. -- John _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
