Georg Sauthoff schrieb: > After a break I built the project again - and it failed (everytime > segfaults). > > Thus I guess that I have problems with the threaded rts (which are more > difficult too reproduce, than the previous ones). > > Ah, and ghci segfaults every time - I didn't test ghci before.
This sounds similar to my problems on sparcs. (I had non-deterministic segfaults) > BTW, what are the disadvantages of a non-threaded rts? I think, threaded/parallel programs can then run under ghci, but Simon (or others) may know better. > The only 'real' problem is libm.so.2 (Solaris 8 has libm.so.1) - I > guess. our ghc-6.4.1 under solaris uses libm.so.1, too. (So it should not be a problem) > Yes, I will try it after I finished the Solaris x86 stuff. At the > solaris/sparc mashines, there is a ghc 6.2 available - but I get > 'gcc notes' like described in this mail: I think also ghc-6.2.2 was a good version under solaris using libreadline.so.4 and gcc-2.95.x! Cheers Christian _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
