On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 17:07 +0100, Chris Kuklewicz wrote: > Would a new and expanded Regex package (Test.Regex.Lazy) be something that > could > be included in the 6.6.0 libraries? What is the best practice for getting it > included? > > It still supports a wrapped Posix regex backend, but also include a PCRE > wrapper > and pure haskell backends and work efficiently on both String and ByteString. > > It runs, has an increasing amount of Haddock documentation, some HUnit tests, > and some new QuickCheck tests are almost done.
Wouldn't it be nice to use Ville Laurikari's TRE package instead of PCRE? [It is also Posix compliant and drop in replacement for gnu regex .. as well as supporting nice extensions] -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
