Building with -package-name comlib-0.1 helps. I saw that Cabal from
HEAD is passing the full package id to GHC but the version compiled in
ghc-6.5.20061001 is passing just the package name. Maybe the change
wasn't merged in GHC-6.6 branch or the bundle wasn't build from the
actual sources.
Cheers,
Krasimir
On 10/4/06, Krasimir Angelov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/4/06, Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did it work with earlier RCs?
It was working with a version slightly older than RC1. Definitely with
a version without the advanced packages support.
>
> Does comlib get wired into the compiler at all? I had a similar problem
> with base, where the compiler had the package name wired in:
> compiler/main/PackageConfig.hs:
> basePackageId = fsToPackageId FSLIT("base")
> but cabal was building it with
> -package-name base-2.0
> To solve it I put
> -package-name base
> in ghc-options in the cabal file.
>
>
> Thanks
> Ian
I am sure comlib isn't wired into the compiler. Perhaps there is a
problem with Cabal somewhere. I will try to put custom -package-name
option. If that works I will take a look into Cabal.
Cheers,
Krasimir
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
