On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:21:04PM +0000, Ross Paterson wrote: > Apart from that, the only thing wrong with seq is its name.
I take back that part. Simon's "strong hint" suggestion looks like a good idea. It's just one of a number of implicit assumptions we make about operational behaviour. After all the Report doesn't actually say that monomorphic pattern-bound variables are shared, either. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
