On 1/12/07, David Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there some simple syntactic refactoring I can do to make this work? E.g. busting the local bindings out of the "let" and into to the global level? The bindings are intertwined, but I could (with some effort) reorder them so that b5000 would only reference b5001...b10000 and never b1...b4999.
Somehow I doubt that the answer is going to be that simple, but for starters, what's your ghc command line? (In particular, are you compiling with -O or not? If ghc is eating that much memory than I'd assume you are, but one should never assume.) Cheers, Kirsten -- Kirsten Chevalier* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Often in error, never in doubt "by God I *KNOW* what this network is for, and you can't have it."--Russ Allbery _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
