Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Simon,

Monday, March 5, 2007, 3:59:17 PM, you wrote:

my Streams library [1] don't uses this thread
at all. for threads created with forkOS it provides excellent
overlapping of I/O and computations (thanks, Simon, situation was
*greatly* improved in 6.6). of course, it should be not so great for
forkIO'd threads

I don't understand why forkOS should be any different from forkIO in this
context.  Could you explain?

There seems to be a common misconception that forkOS is necessary to get certain
kinds of concurrency, and forkIO won't do.  I don't know where this comes from:
the documentation does seem to be quite clear to me.  The only reason to use
forkOS is for interacting with foreign code that uses thread-local state;
everytyhing else can be done with forkIO (and it is usually better to use 
forkIO).

it may be entirely due my ignorance :)  my program anyway uses
-threaded and forkOS in order to run several C threads si,ultaneously
and i don't performed tests in any other conditions

so, one thread may read data from file, another thread write data and
one more make compression using C routine. in 6.4, these tasks was
overlapped only partially while in 6.6 they 100% overlap

don't forget that read/write calls are also foreign calls, so while
all C calls are marked as "safe", 6.4 doesn't overlap them good
enough (also, to make things harder, C compression routine makes calls
back to the Haskell routines). if haskell runtime will create new
threads for executing other Haskell threads while one thread performs
safe C call, then it should be ok. probably, i just mixed up forkOs
and -threaded mode :)

Ok, there was a complete rewrite of the scheduler between 6.4 and 6.6 so this may account for the differences you see.

Beware of forkOS: it'll reduce performance on the Haskell side, because essentially each context switch between a forkOS'd thread and another thread is a complete OS-thread context switch, which is hundreds of times slower than context switching between forkIO'd threads.

Cheers,
        Simon

_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to