Hello Albert, Sunday, April 29, 2007, 2:51:24 AM, you wrote:
>> Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a >> C++ compiler? > .NET literates, will benefit from the many libraries available in .NET. > Can we also include a .NET runtime, a .NET documentation suite, all .NET you are lame. java/c# libs can't be used with current ghc, so 99% of libs we may need are written in c/c++. making porting these lubs as hard as possible and then heroically rewrite them in pure haskell is one way, good for PhD and other pseudo-scientific activity. building bridges to the world of existing software is the way to the real haskell usage in big projects -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
