On Wed, 09 May 2007 17:42:11 +0900, Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Custom/complete: yes, typical: no. What on earth does "typical" mean? The >> user has no idea whether it will install the features they need or not, so >> it's >> a meaningless option. > > From all I can tell, GHC 6.6 has all these options, but they all do > the same thing! If you select custom you can choose whether or not to > install "GHC", but thats as fine-grained as the control gets. > > The options I was thinking off were: > > * GHC (always required) > * Profiling libraries > * HTML documentation > * Register .hs and .lhs extensions > * Set the GHC %PATH% > * Set the Cabal %PATH% > > With the Complete (recommended and default) install being all of them, > Minimal (lacking HTML and profiling) and custom for anything else.
I think we can also ignore theirs on future. * all extra libraries (we don't have caball-install now) * C++ files (if someone doesn't want to compile C++. But we don't support these yet) Best Regards, -- shelarcy <shelarcy hotmail.co.jp> http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/ _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
