For me the type is important, I want to see it for every top level
function. Using named types it serves as documentation.
-- Lennart
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Joel Reymont wrote:
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:23:42 +0100
From: Joel Reymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: GHC Users Mailing List <glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org>
Subject: All warnings but type signatures
Is there a way to enable all warnings but the following:
Hope/Item/DBDesc.hs:6:0:
Warning: Definition but no type signature for `item_db'
Overall, is there an advantage to type signatures in GHC as opposed to
letting the compiler derive them?
Thanks, Joel
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
-- Lennart
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
