On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:42:22PM -0700, Scott Dillard wrote: > You're right. I broke them when experimenting to see where the cycles > were going. I've fixed them, but the other pair of functions, named > gaussElim2, were correct and the issue remains that unsafeRead appears > slower than readArray.
Separating the functions into different executables and compiling with GHC 6.6 without profiling, the unsafe one is definitely faster: ./safe 45.73s user 0.06s system 96% cpu 47.238 total ./unsafe 6.65s user 0.02s system 91% cpu 7.295 total Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
