On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 06:51:12AM -0300, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>> -ddump-parsed shows the program after parsing. All operator application
>> are parsed *left-associative* with one precedence. Then the renamer
>> re-associates them to respect precedence and associativity.
>> So, no, -ddump-parsed will definitely not give syntactically valid
>> Haskell. -ddump-rn probably will though.
>
> yes, in that case, would anyone mind if I find an easy way to change GHC to
> parenthesize those non-infix uses of operators? :) hmm... maybe _I_ would
> mind, since it makes "what GHC is doing" just a tiny bit less transparent
> to the user of -ddump-{rn,parsed}. :-)I fixed an identical bug in a copy of the code a few months ago. http://haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2007-April/007317.html Unfortunately, I think TH was forked off from the in-compiler syntax tree too long ago for my fix to be useful... Stefan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
