On 9/30/07, Serge D. Mechveliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear GHC and Cabal developers and users, > > I suggest to use `runhaskell' rather than `runghc'. > Because it looks to have more sense, and also for political correctness. > Cabal is a tool for `making' various Haskell implementations. > In 2015, we may have implementations ghc, Hugs, hbc, foo_1, ..., foo_n. > Does Cabal need to provide runghc, runhugs, runhbc ... runfoo_n ? > > Do I mistake?
Earlier this year, Sven Panne provided[1] a good reason not to directly install 'runhaskell': [1] http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2007-March/012173.html regards, Bas _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
