[EMAIL PROTECTED] has sent me a new bug report. Apparently he can crash
ghc-6.8.1 when compiling regex-tdfa-0.93 (darcs under
http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/regex-unstable/regex-tdfa/ ).
Should I open a ticket for this?
>
> I darcs got the newest regex-tdfa (0.93 iirc) and made all the obvious
> changes involving LANGUAGE/OPTION_GHC pragmas to get this to work on ghc-6.8.1
>
> prereq regex_base 0.93 installs ok
> regex-tdfa panics with
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/installs/regexstuff/regex-newest/regex-tdfa>runghc
> Setup.hs build
> Preprocessing library regex-tdfa-0.93...
> Building regex-tdfa-0.93...
> [ 1 of 21] Compiling Data.IntMap.CharMap ( Data/IntMap/CharMap.hs,
> dist/build/Data/IntMap/CharMap.o )
>
> Data/IntMap/CharMap.hs:9:27:
> Warning: Imported from `Data.Char' but not used: `chr'
> [ 2 of 21] Compiling Data.IntSet.EnumSet ( Data/IntSet/EnumSet.hs,
> dist/build/Data/IntSet/EnumSet.o )
> [ 3 of 21] Compiling Data.IntMap.EnumMap ( Data/IntMap/EnumMap.hs,
> dist/build/Data/IntMap/EnumMap.o )
> [ 4 of 21] Compiling Text.Regex.TDFA.IntArrTrieSet (
> Text/Regex/TDFA/IntArrTrieSet.hs, dist/build/Text/Regex/TDFA/IntArrTrieSet.o )
> [ 5 of 21] Compiling Text.Regex.TDFA.Common ( Text/Regex/TDFA/Common.hs,
> dist/build/Text/Regex/TDFA/Common.o )
> [ 6 of 21] Compiling Text.Regex.TDFA.Pattern ( Text/Regex/TDFA/Pattern.hs,
> dist/build/Text/Regex/TDFA/Pattern.o )
> [ 7 of 21] Compiling Text.Regex.TDFA.ReadRegex (
> Text/Regex/TDFA/ReadRegex.hs, dist/build/Text/Regex/TDFA/ReadRegex.o )
> [ 8 of 21] Compiling Text.Regex.TDFA.CorePattern (
> Text/Regex/TDFA/CorePattern.hs, dist/build/Text/Regex/TDFA/CorePattern.o )
> ghc-6.8.1: panic! (the 'impossible' happened)
> (GHC version 6.8.1 for i386-unknown-linux):
> splitFunTy
> <nt>mtl-1.1.0.0:Control.Monad.RWS.Lazy.RWS{tc rsRo}
> (base:Data.Maybe.Maybe{tc r6}
> regex-tdfa-0.93:Text.Regex.TDFA.Common.GroupIndex{tc raaa})
> [base:Data.Either.Either{tc 344}
> regex-tdfa-0.93:Text.Regex.TDFA.Common.Tag{tc raai}
> regex-tdfa-0.93:Text.Regex.TDFA.Common.GroupInfo{tc raa4}]
> ([regex-tdfa-0.93:Text.Regex.TDFA.Common.OP{tc raae}]
> -> [regex-tdfa-0.93:Text.Regex.TDFA.Common.OP{tc raae}],
> regex-tdfa-0.93:Text.Regex.TDFA.Common.Tag{tc raai})
> (base:GHC.Prim.Any{(w) tc 31N},
> [regex-tdfa-0.93:Text.Regex.TDFA.Common.Tag{tc raai}])
>
> Please report this as a GHC bug: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug
Note that "Text.Regex.TDFA.Common.Tag" is "type Tag = Int" and compiling the
CorePattern.hs file works fine under ghc-6.6.1. The only unusual thing in
CorePattern is the use of "mdo" recursive-do syntax.
His message continues with the steps he used, and the minimal patch that got it
from ghc-6.6.1 to ghc-6.8.1 :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/installs/regexstuff/regex-newest/regex-tdfa>runghc
> Setup.hs configure
> Configuring regex-tdfa-0.93...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/installs/regexstuff/regex-newest/regex-tdfa>runghc
> Setup.hs build
> Preprocessing library regex-tdfa-0.93...
> Building regex-tdfa-0.93...
>
> Text/Regex/TDFA/MutRunBS.hs:12:17:
> Could not find module `Data.ByteString.Base':
> Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/installs/regexstuff/regex-newest/regex-tdfa>darcs whatsnew
> {
> hunk ./Text/Regex/TDFA/CorePattern.hs 1
> +{-# OPTIONS_GHC -XRecursiveDo #-}
> hunk ./Text/Regex/TDFA/RunMutState.hs 1
> -{-# LANGUAGE CPP #-}
> +{-# OPTIONS_GHC -fglasgow-exts -XCPP #-}
> +
> hunk ./regex-tdfa.cabal 16
> -Build-Depends: regex-base >= 0.80, base >= 2.0, parsec, mtl
> +Build-Depends: regex-base >= 0.80, base >= 2.0, parsec, mtl,
> containers, array, bytestring
> hunk ./regex-tdfa.cabal 45
> -GHC-Options: -Wall -Werror -O2 -funbox-strict-fields
> +GHC-Options: -Wall -Wwarn -O2 -funbox-strict-fields
> }
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/installs/regexstuff/regex-newest/regex-tdfa>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
