On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:35:34PM -0500, Seth Kurtzberg wrote: > Is there any chance of seeing extensible records in GHC 6.10? There seems to > be widespread agreement that the current > situation is unacceptable, but the official GHC policy is that there are too > many good ideas to choose from - so nothing > gets done! I hence humble propose that > http://www.cs.uu.nl/~daan/download/papers/scopedlabels.pdf be adapted to > GHC. In > my naivete, I assume that porting an existing implementation would be much > easier than starting from scratch. Is this > reasonable? > > N.B. I am aware that GHC has limited resources - many thanks to Simon & > Simon and all other contributors either way.
I second this request. Yes, I know you *could* do something in a library; but it's MUCH nicer as a built-in feature. Sadly. Stefan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
