Hi > Optimisation and ghci don't go together, so I don't know what your point > is there.
It's very worth having the application work in both Hugs and GHCi, and its not always GHC=faster, only if you compile it - so you trade your compile time for your run time. A delicate balance, with more than one local optima. > Anyway, its the same with ByteString -- we have it work in ghci or hugs > or nhc, but its only worth actually optimising for GHC. Can you use overloaded Strings with Hugs? I am not aware of how to. I am happy to use RULES's and pragmas etc, but I can't see a way of doing overloaded strings this way, as by the time I've got to RULES I've gained the unpackCString, which just won't go away! Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
