Richard Kelsall wrote:
Hello Glasgow-Haskell Users,
It was suggested to me in this thread in Haskell-Cafe
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-May/042797.html
which was a subsidiary of a previous thread
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-April/042155.html
that there might be some reason other than the -O2 optimisation level
I applied to my version of splitAt that was making my program run about
30% faster than when I used the built-in splitAt.
Can somebody tell me how to check what the -O level is for the built-in
splitAt? Or alternatively tell me what the optimisation level is for
the libraries.
(Sorry I'm not sure of the right terminology for these built-in /
library / Prelude things.)
It's hard to tell what optimisation level your libraries were compiled
with. The default setting is -O, but when building binary distributions we
usually set it explicitly to -O2. If you got your binary from another
source, they might have only used -O.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
