> I never thought about that. I've been using Setup.hs with "#!/usr/bin/env > runhaskell" and never had any problems. > > I guess the only thing that would be gained by using Setup.lhs is the > ability to compile the setup program. Is that something that's commonly > done?
That's what I do. My normal install procedure is: ghc --make setup setup configure setup build setup install If only takes a couple of seconds for ghc to compile setup, and then it runs instantly. If I was to use runghc then it would recompile (in ghci) for each invocation. I use #! in Setup.hs (non-lit) and it compiles fine, so no worries there either. Alistair _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
