On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 04:20:59PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > Claus Reinke wrote: > >>Thank you all. Everything is great now. It was because (Just ghcPath) was > >>not passed into runGhc, and lack of ghc-path. > > > >btw: is ghc-path going to be part of the ghc release or the haskell > >platform? Currently, I can't see it in either, which > >would be a pity. I thought the idea was to provide it in the > >ghc release, but not install it (since cabal install isn't going to be > >part of the ghc release after all). > > I don't think we use ghc-paths in GHC's Haddock now (Ian - correct me if > I'm wrong).
You are right. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
