Quoth Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 11:51 +0000, Ross Paterson wrote:
|> But it could be a reserved word synonymous with \. After all, \ can
|> occur in operator symbols, but the operator \ is reserved.
|
| Presumably that would let you do (\ x -> ...) but not (\x -> ) since the
| "\x" would run together and lexically it would be one identifier.
Good, that's clearly the right way to do it anyway!
Donn
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
