On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jwlato: > > Is this , since it is in IO code, a -fno-state-hack scenario? > Simon wrote recently about when and why -fno-state-hack would be > needed, if you want to follow that up. > > -- Don >
Unfortunately, -fno-state-hack doesn't seem to make much difference. In any case, only the functions that actually do file IO are in the IO monad; otherwise the functions use a generic Monad constraint. Although you have reminded me that I should make a non-IO test case. For Neil, and anyone else interested in looking at this, I'll put the code and build instructions up later today. I've just been cleaning up some test cases to make it easier to run. John _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
