Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > | Is it worth noting it here > | http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Upgrading_packages#Changes_to_GADT_matching > | or is it something that has always existed with GADTs and I just didn't > | trip over it? > > I've added a para. Good idea.
Thanks very much. I'm slightly embarassed: what I meant was that I would add the paragraph if you thought it was worth doing. > OK. let's see if anyone else comments. Do ping me in a while to action it > if I forget. I suppose its priority depends on how many people start to get tripped up. I'm guessing there aren't that many GADT users who don't know (by now at any rate) how to understand the error messages. I'm sure there are plenty of higher priority items. Dominic. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
